Abstract - Comparison of grizzly bear Ursus arctos ...
Accepted Manuscripts / Comparison of grizzly bear Ursus arctos ...
Comparison of grizzly bear Ursus arctos demographics in wilderness mountains versus a plateau with resource development


L. M. Ciarniello, M. S. Boyce, D. R. Seip & D. C. Heard

We studied migration, birth rate, and death rate of 59 grizzly bears (Ursus arctos) on a plateau (n = 29) with extensive forestry activities, and adjacent relatively undeveloped mountains (n = 30), 1998-2003, to examine population parameters and/or limiting factors that might have contributed to a large difference in grizzly bear density between landscapes. Female bears in our low-density area (i.e., plateau) were heavier, in better condition, and more often accompanied by cubs than their mountain counterparts. Survival rates were comparable for adult bears but were significantly lower for subadult bears on the plateau. All deaths of bears that lived on the plateau for which cause of death was identified were human-caused as compared with 1 of 3 in the mountains. Plateau bear deaths were highest in fall coinciding with people hunting other species. Density-dependent factors appeared to be more important to mountain bear demographics whereas bears on the plateau appeared to be limited by human-caused bear mortality. Forest harvest did not appear to have negative effects on reproductive parameters of female bears but associated towns and roads allowed for high human-caused bear mortality. We did not record female dispersal between landscapes leading us to conclude that dispersal from the mountains is unlikely to offset human-caused mortality on the plateau.

Key Words: demography, grizzly bear, Ursus arctos, British Columbia, roads, survival, mortality, resource selection function